Grounded Semantics as Persuasion Dialogue
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the current work, we provide a formal Mackenzie-style persuasion dialogue for grounded semantics. We show that an argument is in the grounded extension iff the proponent is able to persuade a maximally sceptical opponent in the dialogue.
منابع مشابه
Investigating Strategic Considerations in Persuasion Dialogue Games
This paper provides a framework for argumentation-based persuasion dialogues that enables a participant to implement strategies based on its modelling of its interlocutor’s knowledge. The framework is defined on the basis of the recent ASPIC general model of argumentation, and thus accommodates a range of possible instantiations. We extend existing works on persuasion by accounting for both adm...
متن کاملNormative Practical Reasoning: An Argumentation-Based Approach
Autonomous agents operating in a dynamic environment must be able to reason and make decisions about actions in pursuit of their goals. In addition, in a normative environment an agent’s actions are not only directed by the agent’s goals, but also by the norms imposed on the agent. Practical reasoning is reasoning about what to do in a given situation, particularly in the presence of conflicts ...
متن کاملGrounding and Correcting Commitments in Dialogue
This paper provides a logically precise analysis of grounding and disputes in dialogue. The semantics distinguishes among the public commitments of each dialogue participant, including commitments to relational speech acts or rhetorical relations (e.g., Narration, Explanation, Acknowledgement). Thus commitments to the illocutionary contribution of an utterance as well as to its compositional se...
متن کاملConstruction of Dialogue among couples in Yazd : Towards a Grounded Theory
Introduction: Considering the importance of Constructive communication among families; The present study has studied and explained the understanding and experience of dialogue among couples in families in Yazd. Method: In this study, a qualitative approach and grounded theory method and Purposive and theoretical sampling were used and 31 couples from normal families in Yazd were selected and ...
متن کاملStrong Admissibility Revisited
In the current paper, we re-examine the concept of strong admissibility, as was originally introduced by Baroni and Giacomin. We examine the formal properties of strong admissibility, both in its extension-based and in its labelling-based form. Moreover, we show that strong admissibility plays a vital role in discussionbased proof procedures for grounded semantics. In particular it allows one t...
متن کامل